This note, completely based on the elegant paper of L.E. Payne [here], deals primarily with maximum principles for solutions of second order and fourth order elliptic equations. However, some of the results hold for arbitrary sufficiently smooth functions.
Throughout we assume to be a bounded domain in
with sufficiently smooth boundary
so that when necessary the governing differential equation will be satisfied on the boundary. In some of the applications we will need
to be a
surface but in most cases this excessive differentiality can be dispensed with.
We shall adopt the summation convention in which repeated Latin indices are to be summed from to
, and we shall use the comma to denote differentiation. The symbol
will be used for the normal derivative directed outward from
on
.
Following is the results
1. Inequalities based on the geometry of
We start with the maximum value of the gradient of a function whose normal derivative vanishes on a portion of .
Theorem I. Let
have vanishing normal derivative on a portion
of
. Then if the Gaussian curvature o
is everywhere positive the maximum value of
can occur on
if and only if
in
.
We also have the following result
Theorem II. Let
vanish on a portion
of
. Then if the average curvature
is positive at every point of
the maximum value of
cannot occur on
if
in
.
Besides, we have
Theorem III. Let
vanish with its Laplacian on a portion
of
. Then if the average curvature
is positive at every point of
the maximum value of
cannot occur on
if
in
.
Analogous results hold for combinations of higher derivatives of a function . A typical theorem is
Theorem IV. Let
vanish together with its normal derivative on
. Then if the average curvature is positive at every point of
, the quantity
with
but arbitrary, can take its maximum value on
if and only if
in
.
2. Second order equations
Let be a solution of
.
We seek a maximum principle for the function defined by
where is a function to be determined. We first have
Theorem V. Let g(u) satisfy
;
for
;
;
for solutions
of the pde. Then the function
, defined as above will take its maximum value either on
or at a critical point of
provided
.
With somewhat more restrictive assumptions on it is possible to obtain other types of bounds for
. For instance
Theorem VI. Let
satisfy the pde and suppose
in
then the function
defined by
takes its maximum value on
.
3. Auxiliary inequalities
In this section we wish to mention an extension of a well known inequality which will be used in the next section to obtain maximum principles for solutions of fourth order equations. We prove the following
Theorem VII. Let
then
.
4. Fourth order equations
Let be a solution of
.
We establish in this section a number of maximum principles based on specific assumptions on the form of f. These inequalities are in some sense generalizations of the inequality of Miranda for biharmonic functions in the plane. We prove first the following
Theorem VIII. Suppose
in
then the function
defined by
takes its maximum value on
. Here
.
Alternatively with a different assumption on we may establish the following result
Theorem IX. Let
in
; then the function
takes its maximum value on
.
In an analogous way it can be shown that if in
then the quantity
takes its maximum value on the boundary of . This says in particular that
Theorem X. If
in
and
,
on
then
in
.
For the special case in which (a constant) various other maximum principles are possible.
Theorem XI. If
and
satisfies the following
in
and
on
then for
the function
takes its maximum value on
.
A number of applications of the various theorems in this paper could easily be exhibited. We have listed only a few as an indication of the types of results that can be obtained.
I feel lucky to see your post. Would you mind if you share this thesis to me? Here is my e-mail address: sunghan290@snu.ac.kr
I’m a senior in Seoul National University, Korea, and this “P-ftn method” is highly related to my senior thesis. Unfortunately, I couldn’t find this paper online without purchasing(it’s about $40, which I cannot afford).
Good luck.
Comment by Sunghan Kim — November 16, 2012 @ 22:05
Dear Kim, thank you for your interest in my post. You can email to L. E. Payne to get a free copy of the paper.
Comment by Ngô Quốc Anh — November 16, 2012 @ 23:31
Dear Anh, oh, really? I didn’t know that. Thanks for the information.
Comment by Sunghan Kim — November 19, 2012 @ 9:52