I have just passed QE held in August 2009 for my first attendance, I hereby show you the analysis paper
Question 1 [10 marks]. Suppose and
are both measurable functions on the interval
such that for all
Assume that and
both are monotone decreasing and continuous from left. Can you conclude that
for all
? Give the reason to support your answer.
Question 2 [10 marks]. Compute the volume of the region bounded by
where the determinant of the matrix
is NOT equal to zero.
Question 3 [10 marks]. Let be a measureable set in
with finite measure. Suppose
is a real valued continuous function on
such that for almost every
,
is a continuous function of
and for every real number
,
is measurable function of
. If
is a sequence of measurable functions on
that converges to
in measure, show that
converges to
in measure.
Question 4 [10 marks]. Find the function
if is a constant. Justify your answer.
Question 5 [10 marks]. Compute the intergal
where is a constant.
Question 6 [10 marks]. Supposet is a holomorphic function on the complex plane
. If
locally keeps the area invariant, what will the function
be?
Question 7 [10 marks]. Is there an analytic function on
(unit disk in the complex plane with center
) such that
for
with
and
? If so, find such an
. Is it unique?
Question 8 [10 marks]. Let be two positive integers and
and
be open subsets in
and
respectively. Does there exist a map
such that
and the inverse of
are both
? Justify your answer.
Question 9 [10 marks]. Is there a square integrable function on
such that both inequalities
and
hold? Justify your answer.
Question 10 [10 marks]. Let for
be
real numbers such that
for any
. Define
Show that
the limit
does not exist. In this topic, we
.
is a measurable set of measure
. Moreover, for any
,
there are sequences
and
of
such that
either increasing to
or decreasing to
. If
then 
and 
be a measurable space, and let
be two measures. Then
is said to be equivalent to
if
, i.e. the two measures have precisely the same null sets. Equivalence is often denoted
or
.
.
is finite a.e. with respect to the Lebesgue measure on
where



by
.
comes from the following condition 






tridiagonal matrix


present an eigenvalue of the given matrix (denoted by
the corresponding eigenvector with components
. Then
, then we have
are constants and
are the roots of the equation
and
.
-component of the eigenvector is 
and
are two sequences. Then,
![\sum_{k=m}^n f_k\Delta g_k = \left[f_{n+1} g_{n+1} - f_m g_m\right] - \sum_{k=m}^n g_{k+1}\Delta f_k,](http://alt2.mathlinks.ro/latexrender/pictures/e/d/2/ed2d838f489e38ebb455613ba53c4b940d531165.gif)

![\sum_{k=m}^n f_k(g_k}-g_{k-1}) = \left[f_{n+1}g_n - f_m g_{m-1}\right] - \sum_{k=m}^n g_k(f_{k+1}- f_k).](http://alt2.mathlinks.ro/latexrender/pictures/e/7/0/e700a83bb02fae7db75a96eda2e468f185c67b7a.gif)
![\sum_{k=m}^n f_k\Delta g_{k-1} = \left[f_{n+1}g_n - f_m g_{m-1}\right] - \sum_{k=m}^n g_k \Delta f_k,](http://alt2.mathlinks.ro/latexrender/pictures/f/2/7/f27061d9b81a3d645f98377eaa0352425f7ccb68.gif)
the Vitali set which is defined as follows:
are equivalent, and write
, if and only if
is a rational number. This equivalence relation partitions
into an uncountable family of disjoint equivalence classes. By the axiom of choice there is a set
be a sequence of all rationals in
and define
(mod 1).
are pairwise disjoint and
.
, then
(mod 1) and
(mod 1), with
and
belonging to
. Consequently,
, which means that
and therefore
. This shows that
if
. Since each
is in some equivalence class,
differs modulo 1 from an element in
, in
, which proves that
.
such that
, and
and
. Clearly,
is a decreasing sequence. Since the
are pairwise disjoint, we see that
and
. Moreover,
then
are pairwise disjoint and obviously
.
which completes the proof.
is a measurable subset of the Vitali set
.
such that

onto
, and is conformal. Therefore the map
onto
, i.e.,
. Now by a simple calculation
the first and fourth quadrants maps to upper and lower semidisks, respectively.
is the perpendicular bisector of the line segment joining
to
, that is, the imaginary axis. The set
is then the set of points
closer to
. Hence, 
. The inverse map is easily seen to be 
is the perpendicular bisector of the line segment joining
to
, that is, the real axis. The set
is then the set of points
. Hence, 
onto
. The inverse map is easily seen to be 