What we did in this topic was just an version of the Brezis-Lieb lemma. In this topic, we will discuss the generalization of this lemma.
Roughly speaking, what we are going to prove is the following: If is a continuous function such that
, then, when
a.e. and
we claim that
under suitable conditions on and/or
.
To be exact, in addition let satisfy the following hypothesis:
For every sufficiently small , there exists two continuous, nonnegative functions
and
such that
for all .
Theorem. Let
satisfy the above hypothesis and let
be a sequence of measurable functions from
to
such that
a.e.
.
for some constant
, independent of
and
.
for all
.
Then, as
,
Proof. Fix and let
where . As
,
a.e. On the other hand,
Therefore, . By the Lebesgue Dominated Convergence theorem,
as
. However,
and thus
Consequently, . Now let
.
Applications.
- The simplest example is when we choose
where
. In this situation, one has
- We now assume
in
. As a consequence and up to a subsequence,
in
for every
and
a.e. Therefore, for a fixed
, the fact that
in
implies, by the Brezis-Lieb lemma, that
in
.
This is because
is bounded,
a.e. and
.
- The fact that
.
- As a consequence, one has the following result
.