Ngô Quốc Anh

September 17, 2008

Lời giải của Euler cho bài toán Basel về tính tổng của một chuỗi số

Filed under: Các Bài Tập Nhỏ, Giải Tích 4 — Ngô Quốc Anh @ 12:50

The Basel problem is a famous problem in number theory, first posed by Pietro Mengoli in 1644, and solved by Leonhard Euler in 1735. Since the problem had withstood the attacks of the leading mathematicians of the day, Euler’s solution brought him immediate fame when he was twenty-eight. Euler generalised the problem considerably, and his ideas were taken up years later by Bernhard Riemann in his seminal 1859 paper On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude, in which he defined his zeta function and proved its basic properties. The problem is named after Basel, hometown of Euler as well as of the Bernoulli family, who unsuccessfully attacked the problem.

The Basel problem asks for the precise summation of the reciprocals of the squares of the natural numbers, i.e. the precise sum of the infinite series:

\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^2} = \lim_{n \to +\infty}\left(\frac{1}{1^2} + \frac{1}{2^2} + \cdots + \frac{1}{n^2}\right).

The series is approximately equal to 1.644934 (sequence A013661 in OEIS). The Basel problem asks for the exact sum of this series (in closed form), as well as a proof that this sum is correct. Euler found the exact sum to be \frac{\pi^2}{6} and announced this discovery in 1735. His arguments were based on manipulations that were not justified at the time, and it was not until 1741 that he was able to produce a truly rigorous proof.

Proof and comments. Euler’s original “derivation” of the value \frac{\pi^2}{6} is clever and original. He essentially extended observations about finite polynomials and assumed that these same properties hold true for infinite series. Of course, Euler’s original reasoning requires justification, but even without justification, by simply obtaining the correct value, he was able to verify it numerically against partial sums of the series. The agreement he observed gave him sufficient confidence to announce his result to the mathematical community.

To follow Euler’s argument, recall the Taylor series expansion of the sine function

\displaystyle\sin(x) = x - \frac{x^3}{3!} + \frac{x^5}{5!} - \frac{x^7}{7!} + \cdots.

Dividing through by x, we have

\displaystyle\frac{\sin(x)}{x} = 1 - \frac{x^2}{3!} + \frac{x^4}{5!} - \frac{x^6}{7!} + \cdots.

Now, the roots (zeros) of \frac{\sin x}{x} occur precisely at x = n\cdot\pi where n = \pm1, \pm2, \pm3, \dots. Let us assume we can express this infinite series as a product of linear factors given by its roots, just as we do for finite polynomials

\displaystyle\begin{gathered}\frac{{\sin (x)}}{x} = \left( {1 - \frac{x}{\pi }} \right)\left( {1 + \frac{x}{\pi }} \right)\left( {1 - \frac{x}{{2\pi }}} \right)\left( {1 + \frac{x}{{2\pi }}} \right)\left( {1 - \frac{x}{{3\pi }}} \right)\left( {1 + \frac{x}{{3\pi }}} \right) \cdots\hfill \\ \qquad \quad= \left( {1 - \frac{{{x^2}}}{{{\pi ^2}}}} \right)\left( {1 - \frac{{{x^2}}}{{4{\pi ^2}}}} \right)\left( {1 - \frac{{{x^2}}}{{9{\pi ^2}}}} \right) \cdots\hfill \\ \end{gathered}

If we formally multiply out this product and collect all the x^2 terms, we see that the x^2 coefficient of \frac{\sin x}{x} is

\displaystyle -\left(\frac{1}{\pi^2} + \frac{1}{4\pi^2} + \frac{1}{9\pi^2} + \cdots \right) = -\frac{1}{\pi^2}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2}.

But from the original infinite series expansion of \frac{\sin x}{x}, the coefficient of x^2 is -\frac{1}{3!} = -\frac{1}{6}. These two coefficients must be equal; thus,

\displaystyle -\frac{1}{6} = -\frac{1}{\pi^2}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2}.

Multiplying through both sides of this equation by -\pi^2 gives the sum of the reciprocals of the positive square integers

\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}.



  1. What a great post!
    The problem is very nice.

    Comment by dangtuanhiep — September 18, 2008 @ 0:50

  2. The same problem:
    Prove that

    Comment by dangtuanhiep — September 18, 2008 @ 0:56

  3. Cảm ơn Hiệp, thực ra trước giờ mình quen tính các tổng này bằng cách sử dụng khai triển Fourier của 1 hàm thích hợp nào đó, từ đó thay giá trị đặc biệt vào và ta có kết quả cần tìm. Ví dụ với bài toán Basel trên, chỉ cần khai triển Fourier của hàm x trên đoạn (-\pi, \pi) là được.

    Comment by Ngô Quốc Anh — September 18, 2008 @ 0:59

  4. That’s right!
    Đó là phương pháp rất hiệu quả và tổng quát.
    Chúc Quốc Anh sớm đạt được mục đích cao cả…hehe…:D

    Comment by dangtuanhiep — September 19, 2008 @ 13:46

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: